
Damien Hirst, The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living, 1991. Image: artchive.com
How quickly will your contemporary art disintegrate? Will your insurance cover it?
“Repairing and restoring contemporary art can pose novel problems. One example is the 1991 installation piece by Damien Hirst “The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living,” a 14-foot tiger shark suspended in a tank of formaldehyde that is considered the seminal work of the Young British Artists movement. Purchased in 2005 by hedge-fund billionaire Steven A. Cohen of Greenwich, Conn., from the collection of British advertising tycoon Charles Saatchi for a reported $8 million, the dead shark was rotting from the inside out, causing it to take on a withered appearance and clouding the fluid in the tank.
Last year, Mr. Hirst replaced the original shark with another one at his workshop in England — at Mr. Cohen’s expense, a cost well in excess of $100,000, Mr. Cohen’s spokesman confirmed. Though the centerpiece of the work has changed, it hasn’t been regarded as damaged or diminished in value, though the issue is open to question among art historians.”
Read the full article from the Wall Street Journal HERE.
Andrea Carson writes on contemporary art, architecture and design...
2 comments ↓
Hi Andrea, thanks for this post. It is rather stunning. At first you would have thought that the formaldehyde would have prevented the shark from ‘rotting’ but it did not. Damien Hirst should have used a clear resin instead. And then the point that Damien Hirst replaced the original shark with another one?? It is truly preposterous. The piece already is controversial to be calling this art (an aquarium with a taxidermy shark). Then he finds it so universal to be changing his original subject. I don’t find that very serious at all. What he could have better done was to take out the shark, do something to it, maybe inject resin in it (like the other artist known for injecting dead people with it(with great reult), airbrush it a bit and put it back in the water. This piece can never be called the original again. Sorry.
Dimitrios
www.dimitrios-art.com
I think that the value of the artwork is more in the concept than the actual physical piece so I dont see the replacing of the shark as being an issue
http://www.artmarketblog.com
Leave a Comment