Author Sarah Thornton, and her book. Image: inforrm.com
I haven’t read the book, though I know many who have and who thoroughly enjoyed it. Her lawsuit resulted in Thornton winning 65,000 Pounds for libel – the critic apparently claimed to have not been interviewed by Thornton, when in fact she had.
“Most of the damages – £50,000 of the £65,000 – were awarded for this reason: that Barber’s review included a damaging and untrue allegation. But (the judge) added another £15,000 to punish her for being malicious. As he explained: “A reviewer is entitled to be spiteful, so long as she is honest, but if she is spiteful, the court may more readily conclude that misstatements of fact are not honest, since spite or ill will is a motive for dishonesty.”
This excellent article in this weekend’s Financial Times is an overview of the situation is a must-read for any critic or any artist whose work has been subject to a critique. It’s HERE.
Thorton wrote a thoughtful reponse to the lawsuit in the Guardian, also worth reading, which is HERE.
Incidentally, Thornton’s book received excellent reviews in the New York Times, Financial Times, Washington Post, and Sunday Times to name a few.